Siglo xxi Doncella For Financial Fraud
Mar 2, 2009
Why Monetary and financial frauds amount of noise at the global level?
It is very easy to solve this question, we must just get carried away by objective logic,
If we have weak governments legally blind arches.
If there are laws that protect bank savings through insurance of citizens of the state money, this is what bad is that nobody monitors financial institutions.
If there is a constant monitoring and control initiatives by financial institutions.
If you are dismissed to modify this policy gap,
Unfortunately these people (officials and politicians) are making the world a place InVivo, with the biggest economic crisis of this decade.
There is a domino effect with these scammers bank, made the first fraud, no conviction, no imprisonment, as part of the government covers your defalco, yes it is good business round.
Other scammers who see the actions of governments, immediately reach the same fraudulent occasions.
Who benefits from this?
Who conduct fraud, bankruptcy, or real or unreal.
Large employers responsible for representing these entities.
Justice and government.
And those who suffer from the crisis?
Sure, The beggar PUEBLO, andalusia not have anyone representing him, besides the money the state will not hurt any politician.
Que viva el extremist prevailing capitalist system, road to perdition we go again.
Solution
New leaders will be born with transparent and clear political will to fight for injustice, someone who is capable of putting the point and besides, it's hard but I love to dream of a better country and a new world.
Joining the differences between the monetary policies of each country and the general principles for the proper functioning of the banking world, it would be an incentive recommended dysfunctional and bureaucratic situations, be subject to taxes of the International Monetary Fund which serves as international bank or any lending institution world, they offer outstanding claims for sub-developed nations lend money to guarantee the absolute control of the economy of that country, first because its capital is, of course this is not bad if, when deliver the substance to a country shall apply measures to control spending of borrowed money, but it is not the money is disbursed, the rulers squander the money and who pays for it .... famous people with higher taxes in order to offset the tax money desfraudado by the rulers. this should be revised because it does not work for me.
It is very easy to solve this question, we must just get carried away by objective logic,
If we have weak governments legally blind arches.
If there are laws that protect bank savings through insurance of citizens of the state money, this is what bad is that nobody monitors financial institutions.
If there is a constant monitoring and control initiatives by financial institutions.
If you are dismissed to modify this policy gap,
Unfortunately these people (officials and politicians) are making the world a place InVivo, with the biggest economic crisis of this decade.
There is a domino effect with these scammers bank, made the first fraud, no conviction, no imprisonment, as part of the government covers your defalco, yes it is good business round.
Other scammers who see the actions of governments, immediately reach the same fraudulent occasions.
Who benefits from this?
Who conduct fraud, bankruptcy, or real or unreal.
Large employers responsible for representing these entities.
Justice and government.
And those who suffer from the crisis?
Sure, The beggar PUEBLO, andalusia not have anyone representing him, besides the money the state will not hurt any politician.
Que viva el extremist prevailing capitalist system, road to perdition we go again.
Solution
New leaders will be born with transparent and clear political will to fight for injustice, someone who is capable of putting the point and besides, it's hard but I love to dream of a better country and a new world.
Joining the differences between the monetary policies of each country and the general principles for the proper functioning of the banking world, it would be an incentive recommended dysfunctional and bureaucratic situations, be subject to taxes of the International Monetary Fund which serves as international bank or any lending institution world, they offer outstanding claims for sub-developed nations lend money to guarantee the absolute control of the economy of that country, first because its capital is, of course this is not bad if, when deliver the substance to a country shall apply measures to control spending of borrowed money, but it is not the money is disbursed, the rulers squander the money and who pays for it .... famous people with higher taxes in order to offset the tax money desfraudado by the rulers. this should be revised because it does not work for me.